Legal Compliance65/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the remaining submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements is a significant legal compliance oversight.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity60/100
The technical description of the required scintillator screens and their application is exceptionally clear and detailed. However, the tender lacks specified evaluation criteria, and the AI-extracted requirements note the absence of eligibility and financial requirements, which significantly hinders overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing eligibility requirements
Completeness40/100
While basic information, value, and duration are provided, the critical 'Tender Notice' document failed to download, rendering the tender fundamentally incomplete for any interested party. Furthermore, essential eligibility, financial, and evaluation criteria are not defined.
•Main 'Tender Notice' document failed to download
•Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness45/100
The inability to access the primary tender document, coupled with the complete absence of evaluation criteria, severely compromises the fairness and transparency of this procurement. The lack of e-submission further creates an unequal playing field. While the technical requirements are highly specific, this is likely justified by the specialized scientific context rather than being tailored.
•Main 'Tender Notice' document failed to download
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality50/100
The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission capabilities, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The failed download of a key document also presents a practical barrier for bidders.
•No e-submission
•Main 'Tender Notice' document failed to download
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields. No disputes or suspensions are reported.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation-focused criteria. While the underlying project (ISIS Endeavour Programme) is innovative, the tender itself does not solicit or evaluate sustainability aspects from suppliers.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria