Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Plant and Equipment Asset Valuations

This tender provides basic information and utilizes an e-tendering system, but suffers from significant deficiencies in completeness and clarity, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria and key legal requirements, severely impacting fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided summary is a notable legal compliance concern. The missing 'reveal date' also hinders a full timeline assessment.

While the core service description is clear, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major flaw. The mention of 'Divided into Parts' without further explanation and the lack of detailed performance conditions also reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

The tender provides basic administrative details but lacks several crucial components. Key omissions include evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and explicit financial requirements. A discrepancy in the estimated value (EUR vs GBP) and the lack of detailed tender specifications (beyond administrative documents) further reduce completeness.

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical fairness issue, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. While e-procurement is enabled and requirements appear generic, this fundamental lack of transparency severely undermines the fairness of the process. Document access is only after expressing interest, which is a minor barrier.

The tender supports electronic submission and provides clear contract start and duration dates, which are practical aspects. However, the absence of a direct URL to the e-tendering system in the basic information and a lack of specific financing details slightly reduce its overall practicality.

The most significant inconsistency is the discrepancy in the estimated value (60,000 EUR in basic info vs. £50,000 in document summaries). Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'. Dates are otherwise logical.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.