Legal Compliance100/100
The tender states it operates under the Light Touch Regime of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, which is appropriate for health and social work services. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text and the absence of full tender documents make it impossible to verify full compliance with all legal requirements.
•Absence of full tender documents prevents verification of legal compliance.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly detailed in the provided text.
Clarity40/100
The description provides a clear overview of the service's purpose and the lot structure. However, without the full tender documents (e.g., Invitation to Tender, specifications), the detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and contractual terms remain entirely unclear.
•Detailed service specifications are missing.
•Evaluation criteria are not provided.
Completeness83/100
The provided information is highly incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached tender documents. Key elements such as detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, submission instructions, and contract terms are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant offer.
•No tender documents are attached or available.
•Evaluation criteria are entirely missing.
Fairness80/100
The multi-lot structure and the 'open list' approach suggest an intention to promote broad participation and choice. However, the complete lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess whether the process is truly fair and transparent for all potential providers. Without these, there's a significant risk of arbitrary decision-making.
•Absence of evaluation criteria prevents assessment of fairness in selection.
•Lack of detailed requirements could lead to subjective interpretation.
Practicality40/100
The concept of an open provider list for a 5-7 year duration is practical for ensuring continuous service availability and flexibility. However, the current state of the tender, with no documents, makes it entirely impractical for any supplier to understand what is required to apply or how services will be delivered.
•Impossible for suppliers to prepare a bid without tender documents.
•No information on the application process or required submission format.
Data Consistency100/100
The basic information provided (title, reference, organization, value, duration, lots) appears consistent within the limited scope. However, the absence of any detailed documents means there is no further content to cross-reference for consistency.
•Limited data available for comprehensive consistency check.
Sustainability0/100
The provided information does not include any specific sustainability, green procurement, or innovation criteria. While the service itself addresses social needs, the tender documentation does not indicate an explicit focus on broader sustainability aspects.
•No explicit green procurement criteria mentioned.
•No specific social criteria beyond the core service provision.