Simplified Renovation of Aizkraukle Clinic Reception Area

This tender for the renovation of Aizkraukle Clinic's reception area demonstrates good clarity and structure, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, raising serious fairness and transparency concerns.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, assigns an appropriate CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission period. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding legal principles of transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental to public procurement.

The project description is clear, and requirements are well-documented by referencing specific detailed documents such as architectural drawings, cost estimates, and tender regulations. The summaries indicate that evaluation criteria (lowest price) are specified within the documents, addressing the automated flag.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. All necessary documents are attached. However, the estimated contract value is not disclosed, which is a notable omission.

Fairness is severely compromised by the 'Restricted document access', which prevents equal access to information for all potential bidders. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency. While 'E-Procurement' is a positive, its benefit is undermined by the access restriction.

Electronic submission is supported, and contract duration and EU funding information are clear. However, the 'Restricted document access' creates a significant practical barrier for bidders, and the contract start date is not specified.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor discrepancies exist between automated flags and document summaries (e.g., e-submission, evaluation criteria), but the core tender data appears consistent.

The tender explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. While it is EU-funded, this characteristic does not translate into explicit sustainability requirements within the tender documentation itself.