NorTMS External Audit 10.04

This tender for an external audit of the NorTMS system demonstrates good practicality and data consistency, but significantly lacks clarity and fairness due to missing evaluation criteria and detailed requirements.

The tender generally complies with basic legal requirements, featuring a clear procedure type and appropriate CPV codes. However, the absence of a specified tender reveal date and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds represents minor disclosure gaps.

While the service description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how proposals will be assessed. Detailed eligibility requirements are also not specified.

Basic tender information, financial details, and document access are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, detailed eligibility requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds.

The use of an e-sourcing portal and disclosed value promote equal access. However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria is a major concern, potentially leading to an opaque and unfair selection process. Requirements do not appear tailored.

The tender scores highly on practicality, offering electronic submission via a dedicated portal with direct links. Key dates (submission, contract start) and duration are clearly specified, facilitating bidder planning.

Data consistency is generally good, with logical dates and no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for procedure type, an empty 'Liable Person' field, and a slight discrepancy between EUR and GBP estimated values.

The tender does not incorporate any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to align the procurement with broader sustainability objectives.