Audit & Investment Plan for Bromsgrove Parish Play Area and Third Sector Facilities

This tender demonstrates good clarity on scope and evaluation criteria but is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission and missing key transparency details like the reveal date and specific eligibility requirements.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, the reveal date is missing, which is a transparency gap. The absence of specific eligibility requirements beyond mandatory exclusion could be a minor compliance risk for some national regulations.

The tender's description is clear, and evaluation criteria (Quality 60%, Price 40%) are well-defined, contradicting the automated flag. However, the lack of specific eligibility requirements and detailed performance conditions beyond contract duration reduces overall clarity.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are largely complete. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the tender lacks the reveal date, specific eligibility requirements, and elaboration on the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic.

The tender discloses its value, and evaluation criteria are objective and transparent. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant barrier to equal access and fairness in modern procurement.

Contract duration and start date are clearly specified. However, the critical lack of electronic submission significantly impacts the practicality and efficiency of the bidding process for potential suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, as well as a slight discrepancy in the estimated value between EUR and GBP in different documents.

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a significant missed opportunity to incorporate modern sustainability principles into public procurement.