NCC1682 Framework Agreement for Asbestos Removal & Disposal Works

This tender for asbestos removal services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and scope. However, it suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the provided information lacks explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds and a tender reveal date, which are standard legal disclosure requirements.

The overall description of the framework and its lots is clear. However, the tender explicitly lacks detailed evaluation criteria, which is a significant omission for bidders. Additionally, financial requirements are not detailed in the provided summary.

Basic information, financial value, duration, and location are well-provided. Five documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete regarding detailed financial requirements, mandatory exclusion grounds, and crucially, the specific evaluation criteria.

The tender discloses the estimated value and appears to offer document access. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the lack of electronic submission creates an unnecessary barrier and reduces equal access for potential bidders.

Key practical details like contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly stated. The main practical drawback is the absence of electronic submission, which is a standard feature in modern procurement and simplifies the bidding process.

The tender exhibits high data consistency with logical dates, populated key fields (with minor exceptions like empty codes for procedure type and liable person), and no reported disputes or suspensions.

The tender shows a complete absence of any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.