Legal Compliance35/100
The tender's fundamental contradiction between being an 'Open' and 'open competition' procedure and simultaneously a 'closed, invite only process' is a severe legal compliance issue. The absence of evaluation criteria and a missing tender reveal date further detract from compliance with basic procurement principles.
•Contradictory tender procedure type ('Open'/'open competition' vs. 'closed, invite only')
•Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity45/100
While the description of services is clear, the conflicting information regarding the tender type/procedure and the estimated value introduces significant ambiguity. The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity deficiency, preventing bidders from understanding assessment methods.
•Contradictory tender procedure type
•Inconsistent estimated project value (EUR vs. GBP)
Completeness55/100
Basic information and service requirements are present. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria, the missing tender reveal date, and one failed document download significantly reduce the overall completeness of the tender documentation.
•Absence of evaluation criteria
•Missing tender reveal date
Fairness25/100
The designation as a 'closed, invite only process' for an 'open competition' fundamentally undermines fairness and equal access, suggesting potential tailoring or severe restriction of competition. The complete lack of evaluation criteria further compromises transparency and objectivity.
•Tender described as 'closed, invite only' despite being 'Open' and 'open competition'
•Absence of evaluation criteria
Practicality75/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the Citizen E-Procurement portal, and key contract dates (start, duration) are specified. While a direct document URL is not provided, documents are listed. Financing information is basic but present.
•No direct document URL provided
•Limited detailed financing information beyond estimated value
Data Consistency35/100
There are critical inconsistencies in the tender information, most notably the contradiction between the declared 'Open' / 'open competition' procedure and the 'closed, invite only' nature. The discrepancy in the estimated project value (EUR vs. GBP) is also a significant concern.
•Contradiction in tender procedure type
•Inconsistent estimated project value and currency
Sustainability25/100
The tender documentation does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is no indication of EU funding, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
•No mention of green procurement criteria
•No inclusion of social aspects