Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a DPS under the Light Touch Regime is a legally compliant procurement approach for this type of service. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided information is a significant legal compliance risk.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100
While the overall concept of the DPS and its purpose is clear, the specific requirements for suitability and capability are vague and lack detail. Bidders cannot understand what is truly expected without further documentation.
•Vague suitability and capability requirements
•Lack of detailed criteria for assessment
Completeness83/100
The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Crucial elements such as full tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.
•No tender documents attached
•Missing detailed eligibility and technical requirements
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure, being open to new entrants throughout its lifespan, promotes fairness and broad market access. However, the critical absence of detailed suitability, capability, and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining fairness.
•Risk of subjective assessment due to missing detailed evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100
The DPS model is practical for the College's long-term needs. However, from a bidder's perspective, preparing a meaningful submission is impractical without access to comprehensive tender documents and clear, detailed requirements.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare submissions without full documentation
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data points (e.g., 10-year duration, estimated value over 10 years) are consistent with each other and the DPS model.
Sustainability0/100
The provided information does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, which are increasingly important aspects of modern public procurement.
•Absence of sustainability criteria
•Absence of social criteria