Legal Compliance75/100
The tender is a preliminary market engagement (RFI), which explains the 'None' for Type/Procedure and the lack of formal evaluation criteria. The 21-day response period is reasonable for an RFI, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the missing reveal date and classified value are minor compliance issues, even for an RFI.
•Missing reveal date
•Estimated value classified
Clarity80/100
The purpose of the RFI is clearly stated, seeking market input for a future SOC procurement. The AI-extracted requirements for this RFI phase are clear and understandable. The absence of evaluation criteria and performance conditions is appropriate for a preliminary market engagement.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. Requirements for the RFI are defined. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and while appropriate for an RFI, the lack of formal tender documents (ITT, SOW) means it's not a complete tender package.
•Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100
Document access is provided, and the requirements for specialist SOC suppliers are generic and not tailored. The 21-day deadline for an RFI is reasonable. While the value is classified and e-submission is not supported, these are more transparency and practicality issues than direct unfairness in terms of criteria or access to information for this preliminary stage.
•Estimated value classified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback for potential suppliers. The classified value also limits suppliers' ability to gauge the scale and allocate resources effectively.
•No e-submission
•Estimated value classified
Data Consistency90/100
The data provided is largely consistent, with logical dates and no disputes. The 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' are consistent with the 'planning' status and RFI nature. Minor gaps include an empty 'Liable Person' field.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
Sustainability50/100
There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender information. While this is a preliminary market engagement, it represents a missed opportunity to signal interest in sustainable solutions or gather market insights on these aspects.
•No green procurement
•No social criteria