Legal Compliance40/100
The tender exhibits a critical inconsistency between the stated contract duration of 60 months and a completion date of 2026-05-29, which is one day after the contract start. This fundamental contradiction poses significant legal risks and indicates a severe flaw in the tender documentation. The procedure type and CPV codes are correctly identified.
•Critical contradiction in contract duration and completion date.
Clarity35/100
The description of works is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are understandable. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Furthermore, the severe contradiction regarding contract duration and completion date introduces profound ambiguity.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Critical contradiction in contract duration and completion date.
Completeness30/100
While basic information, deadlines, and location are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value. The contradictory information regarding contract duration and completion date also represents a significant gap in complete and accurate information.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Undisclosed estimated value
Fairness40/100
The absence of clear evaluation criteria is a major impediment to fairness, as it prevents objective assessment and transparency for all bidders. The classified estimated value also reduces transparency. While requirements appear generic, these fundamental omissions severely compromise the tender's fairness.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Classified estimated value.
Practicality50/100
Electronic submission is supported via a dedicated portal, and a document URL is provided. The contract start date is known. However, the lack of disclosed financial information (estimated value) and the critical inconsistency in contract duration/completion date reduce the practicality for potential bidders to accurately prepare proposals.
•Undisclosed estimated value
•Contradictory contract duration and completion date.
Data Consistency20/100
The tender suffers from severe data inconsistencies, most notably the contradiction between a 60-month contract duration and a completion date of 2026-05-29. Additionally, the summary of the 'Official PDF Version' incorrectly states the submission deadline as the contract completion date, indicating widespread data integrity issues.
•Critical contradiction in contract duration and completion date
•Inconsistent submission deadline information in document summaries.
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its requirements or description.
•No explicit sustainability criteria.