Legal Compliance85/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no disputes. While the reveal date is missing from the provided data, compliance with UK public procurement regulations is assumed for an open procedure, and mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met through the portal.
•Missing reveal date in the provided data
Clarity60/100
The service description and basic requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity of the tender, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness65/100
Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are accessible via the portal. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria is a significant gap, and some administrative fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are missing.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Liable Person and procedure codes are missing
Fairness60/100
Full document access is provided via a free registration portal, the value is disclosed, and electronic submission is supported, promoting equal access. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts the fairness and transparency of the procurement process.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality90/100
Electronic submission is fully supported via the provided portal URL. The contract start date, financing information, and duration (initial term with optional extensions) are all clearly specified, making the tender highly practical for potential bidders.
Data Consistency85/100
Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty 'Liable Person' and procedure code fields, and a slight variance between the estimated EUR value and the converted GBP total, which is acceptable for an estimate.
•Liable Person and procedure codes are missing
Sustainability40/100
While the service itself (Bikeability training) inherently promotes active travel and health, the tender documentation does not explicitly include green, social, or innovation criteria for the procurement process or the provider's operations. It is not EU funded.
•Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria