Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) Litter Survey

This tender, currently in planning as a preliminary market engagement, provides a clear project description and requirements but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, procedure type, and electronic submission capabilities.

Legal compliance is moderate due to the absence of a clearly defined procedure type and the tender's reveal date. While CPV codes are appropriate and no disputes are noted, these fundamental omissions are significant, even for a preliminary notice.

The tender's description and AI-extracted requirements are commendably clear and detailed, outlining the study's purpose, methodology, and outputs. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly detracts from overall clarity.

While basic information, financial details, timeline, and documents are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and a defined procedure type. Key fields like 'Liable Person' are also empty.

Fairness is significantly impacted by the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for transparent and objective assessment. The absence of an e-submission option also creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders.

Practicality is hampered by the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. While contract dates and duration are clear, the absence of a direct URL for tender documents is also a minor drawback.

Data consistency is generally good, with logical dates and no noted disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies exist with empty 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields, but core data is sound.

The tender scores well on sustainability due to its core objective of supporting the Deposit Return Scheme and wider Circular Economy policies, inherently promoting environmental goals. However, it lacks explicit social or innovation criteria within the procurement process itself.