Legal Compliance100/100
The tender's eligibility criteria, specifically restricting competition to UK-based SMEs, appears disproportionate and potentially discriminatory, limiting competition unnecessarily. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds is also a compliance risk.
•Disproportionate and discriminatory eligibility criteria (UK-based SME restriction)
•Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity40/100
The description of works is clear, but the technical capability requirements are generic and lack measurable specifics, making objective assessment difficult.
•Generic and non-measurable technical capability requirements
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of any tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.
•Absence of all tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100
The restriction to UK-based SMEs severely limits competition and raises concerns about potential tailoring or undue preference. The lack of evaluation criteria further compromises fairness and transparency.
•Highly restrictive eligibility criteria (UK-based SME)
•Lack of transparent evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100
The lack of detailed documentation and specific requirements makes it impractical for potential bidders to accurately scope the work and submit a well-informed tender.
•Impractical for bidders due to lack of detailed documentation
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent, but its incompleteness is the primary issue.
Sustainability0/100
While the description mentions 'methods that support natural vegetation establishment,' there are no explicit green, social, or innovation criteria, representing missed opportunities for sustainable procurement.
•Missed opportunities for explicit green, social, or innovation criteria