Lambeth - Enhanced mental Health Crisis Prevention Service

Overall, the tender documentation is clear and transparent regarding service description and evaluation, but it has notable deficiencies in e-submission and sustainability aspects. Key legal requirements for mandatory exclusion grounds are also not explicitly detailed.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined. However, the explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds is missing, which is a significant legal omission. No disputes or suspensions are reported, which is positive.

The service description is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial aspects, and submission are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria (80% quality, 20% price) are clearly specified, despite an automated flag to the contrary.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the reveal date, which are important for full completeness.

The estimated value is disclosed, and evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (80% quality, 20% price). Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of e-submission significantly reduces fairness and equal access for potential bidders.

Contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a major practical drawback, potentially complicating the bidding process for many suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. A minor inconsistency exists where automated checks flag 'No evaluation criteria specified,' which contradicts the explicit 80% quality / 20% price criteria mentioned in the document summaries and AI-extracted requirements.

The tender documentation does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects (beyond the inherent social value of the service itself), or innovation focus as criteria for bidders. It is also not EU funded.