Stray Dog and Kennelling Service

This tender for stray dog services demonstrates good basic structure and electronic accessibility, but is significantly hampered by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements, impacting clarity and fairness.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a tender reveal date and the lack of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the summaries are minor compliance concerns.

The description of services and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are all provided, and documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and the tender reveal date.

Document access, value disclosure, and e-procurement support contribute positively to fairness. Requirements are generic and SMEs are encouraged. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw that undermines the objectivity and transparency of the selection process.

The tender supports electronic submission, provides a document URL, and clearly specifies the contract start date and duration, making it highly practical for bidders. The estimated value is also provided.

Data consistency is high, with no reported suspensions or disputes, and logical dates. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value is a minor inconsistency, but these do not significantly impact overall data integrity.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to align with modern sustainability standards in public procurement.