Supply of spare parts for fire fighting aerial ladders (for two years)

This tender for fire-fighting aerial ladder spare parts demonstrates good basic information and a reasonable timeline, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and inconsistencies regarding e-submission and detailed evaluation criteria.

The tender defines the procedure type, provides a reasonable submission deadline (21 days), and uses an appropriate CPV code. No disputes are flagged. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for legal compliance regarding transparency and equal treatment.

The tender's title and description are clear, and requirements are categorized. However, the explicit flag 'Missing evaluation criteria' indicates a lack of detailed clarity, even if 'lowest price' is mentioned, which can lead to ambiguity in application.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification codes are all provided. Documents are listed. However, 'Restricted document access' means the full tender content is not readily available, impacting overall completeness from a bidder's perspective.

The disclosed value and reasonable deadline contribute positively. However, 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, preventing equal access to information. The contradiction regarding 'E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission' also raises concerns about equal access to the submission process.

The duration is clearly specified. However, the flagged 'No e-submission' (despite 'E-Procurement' characteristic) reduces practicality for bidders. 'Restricted document access' also makes it impractical to prepare a comprehensive bid.

Most key fields are populated logically, and dates are consistent. However, there are significant contradictions: 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic, but 'No e-submission' is flagged. Also, the AI summary mentions 'lowest price award criteria' while automated checks flag 'Missing evaluation criteria'.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.