Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears generally compliant with basic principles for an open competition below threshold. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the complete absence of full tender documents raise significant concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment of bidders.
Clarity40/100
The description of the required works is highly detailed and clear, outlining specific tasks, materials, and environmental challenges, which is a strength for potential bidders to understand the scope.
Completeness83/100
This tender is severely lacking in completeness. The complete absence of essential tender documents (e.g., detailed specifications, drawings, bill of quantities, contract terms, instructions to bidders) and explicit evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.
Fairness60/100
The 'single Contractor' requirement is standard for works contracts. While the technical requirements are highly specific and demanding, they appear to reflect the project's inherent complexity and risks (e.g., fast-flowing river, CAT 3 checks) rather than being overtly tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess how bids will be fairly judged.
Practicality40/100
The detailed technical requirements are practical for ensuring project success, especially regarding temporary works design, environmental compliance, and safety in a challenging river environment. The 7-month contract duration seems achievable for an experienced contractor given the scope.
Data Consistency100/100
A minor inconsistency exists in the estimated value, stated as '420,000.00 EUR' in the financial information and later as '£420,000 (or 420,000 EUR)' in the financial requirements. This should be clarified.
Sustainability0/100
No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are mentioned. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.