Completion of construction project development, author supervision, and construction works for three standard buildings (design-build)

This tender presents significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria, which undermines legal compliance and clarity despite otherwise detailed documentation.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes correctly, and no disputes are reported. However, the fundamental omission of evaluation criteria constitutes a significant breach of procurement regulations, severely impacting transparency and equal treatment. The undisclosed estimated value is also a minor compliance concern.

While the project description, technical requirements, and submission forms are detailed and well-structured, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, creating significant ambiguity in the tender process.

Most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, duration, and comprehensive requirements, is provided. However, the tender lacks the estimated value and, critically, the evaluation criteria, which are indispensable for a complete and fair procurement process.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, which introduces subjectivity and potential for arbitrary decisions. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency. While requirements do not appear tailored, these fundamental omissions create an uneven playing field. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if true for bidders, would be an additional major concern.

The tender provides numerous forms and a clear structure for submission. However, there is a contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check indicating 'No e-submission,' which could create practical difficulties for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency regarding e-submission capabilities (E-Procurement characteristic vs. automated check result) and the estimated value is missing. The 'Restricted document access' flag also suggests a potential inconsistency if all documents are indeed summarized.

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. It also incorporates Building Information Modeling (BIM), indicating an innovation focus in project delivery. However, explicit green procurement criteria or specific social aspects are not detailed.