Legal Compliance75/100
As a market engagement notice, it appropriately defines its status and purpose. The CPV code is relevant, and there are no disputes. The absence of a formal procedure type is consistent with its planning status, indicating compliance with the initial stages of procurement principles.
•Type: None
•Procedure: None (understandable for planning notice)
Clarity85/100
The description of the future requirement, desired outcomes, and the purpose of the market engagement (seeking interest and feedback) is exceptionally clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and directly reflect the stated objectives.
•No evaluation criteria specified (minor for a planning notice)
Completeness75/100
All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. While the value is classified and evaluation criteria are absent, this is common and acceptable for a market engagement phase.
•Value not disclosed (classified)
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness80/100
The invitation for market feedback and suggestions demonstrates a commitment to an open and fair process, ensuring requirements are not tailored. Document access is provided. However, the classified value and lack of e-submission reduce overall transparency and accessibility for potential providers.
•Value not disclosed (classified)
•No e-submission
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for future planning by interested parties. However, the absence of electronic submission and the classified value present practical hurdles for potential providers in engaging with the process.
•No e-submission
•Value not disclosed (classified)
Data Consistency90/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Key fields are populated, with the 'None' status for type/procedure being consistent with a planning notice. The only minor inconsistency is the empty 'Liable Person' field.
Sustainability40/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria beyond the inherent nature of the service (physical activity), or innovation focus in its requirements for providers or the procurement process itself.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria