16-19 Study Programme Offer: Berkshire (Football)

This tender provides a clear description of the required services and facilities for a community-based football programme, with a strong focus on social inclusion. However, the significant absence of evaluation criteria is a major concern for transparency and fairness, alongside the lack of electronic submission.

Legal compliance is generally good, with a clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and reasonable submission deadlines. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable transparency issue that touches upon fundamental procurement principles.

The description and AI-extracted requirements are very clear and detailed, outlining facilities, staffing, qualifications, and outreach expectations. Nevertheless, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly diminishes overall clarity for bidders, as they lack understanding of how proposals will be judged.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. Requirements are well-defined. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the lack of elaboration on the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic significantly impact the tender's completeness.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a significant fairness concern, as it prevents objective assessment and transparency for bidders. The lack of electronic submission also limits equal access. While requirements are specific and an existing partner is mentioned, they are not definitively tailored to exclude all but one provider.

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical limitation in modern procurement, impacting efficiency and accessibility for potential bidders. Other practical details like contract start date, duration, and financing information are adequately provided.

Data consistency is high, with most key fields populated and logical dates. Minor inconsistencies include empty 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, and the slightly ambiguous 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value.

The tender explicitly incorporates strong social aspects, focusing on attracting learners from underrepresented demographics and providing work experience. However, it lacks any mention of green procurement criteria or innovation focus.