Procurement of Specialised Pharmaceutical Logistics and Warehouse Services for Vaccination & Immunisation Programmes

This tender provides a clear service description and essential contract details, but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and potential tailoring of requirements, impacting fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. The missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue, but does not indicate a major legal non-compliance based on the provided information.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria in the provided summary significantly diminishes the overall clarity of the tender process.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is present. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements in the provided summary represents significant gaps in completeness.

The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness, as it hinders transparent assessment. The requirement to 'ideally building on experience from the COVID-19 vaccination programme' strongly suggests potential tailoring towards incumbent providers, limiting fair competition. The deadline, while not legally problematic, is tight for a complex, high-value contract.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Registration on the 'Health Family Single eCommercial System' implies electronic interaction and likely e-submission, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise. The ambiguity around e-submission is a slight detractor.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are minor gaps such as missing codes for procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field. A notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value, stated in EUR in basic info but in GBP in a document summary, with a non-negligible difference.

The tender includes positive social aspects such as adherence to social value, Living Foundation Wage, and anti-modern slavery practices. However, it lacks explicit focus on green procurement or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability score.