Calibration of laboratory equipment for the needs of the State Plant Protection Service

This tender for laboratory equipment calibration demonstrates good basic structure and detailed technical requirements across its many parts, but is significantly hampered by critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, contract duration, and accessibility, which raise concerns about fairness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure type, CPV code, and reasonable submission deadline. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' are significant concerns that could impact legal compliance regarding transparency and equal treatment.

The tender provides a clear description and detailed AI-extracted requirements, further broken down into 30 specific parts with individual technical specifications. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely diminishes the clarity for potential bidders on how their offers will be assessed.

Basic information, financial details, and location are well-provided, and a substantial number of documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of specified contract duration and, more critically, the lack of defined evaluation criteria.

While the tender's value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and its division into 30 parts could promote broader participation, fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access' and the 'Missing evaluation criteria'. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises concerns about equal access.

The tender's practicality is significantly hindered by the flagged 'No e-submission' in 2026, which creates unnecessary administrative burden. The absence of a clear contract duration and start date also makes planning difficult for bidders and the contracting authority.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'E-Procurement' characteristic being listed while 'No e-submission' is flagged as an issue, which could cause confusion.

The tender shows no explicit integration of green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.