GROUNDS MAINTENANCE

This tender for Grounds Maintenance services exhibits significant deficiencies in documentation accessibility and the clarity and completeness of its requirements, posing substantial risks to fairness and transparency for potential bidders.

The absence of the main 'Tender Notice' document (page not found) and the lack of specific mandatory exclusion or eligibility grounds in the AI-extracted content raise serious concerns regarding full legal disclosure and compliance with procurement regulations. The procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified, and there are no reported disputes.

While the overall service description is clear, the tender suffers from a critical lack of detailed requirements. Crucially, evaluation criteria are entirely missing, and eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are either generic or explicitly stated as 'no specific' in the AI-extracted data, making it difficult for bidders to understand expectations.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is present. However, the tender is incomplete regarding critical details like specific eligibility, financial, and evaluation criteria. Furthermore, two of the four listed documents are inaccessible, severely impacting the overall completeness of the available tender package.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the inaccessibility of key tender documents and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which introduces a high risk of subjective assessment. The lack of e-submission further limits equal access and efficiency for potential bidders.

The tender's practicality is hampered by the lack of electronic submission capabilities, which is a significant drawback in modern procurement. Additionally, the inaccessibility of some listed documents creates practical hurdles for interested parties. Contract start date and duration are clearly specified.

Key data fields are largely populated, and dates (submission, contract start, duration) are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor discrepancy exists between the EUR and GBP estimated values, but this is not a critical inconsistency. The 'Liable Person' field is empty.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, and is not identified as EU-funded. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.