Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears legally deficient due to the absence of standard mandatory exclusion grounds. The 'UK supplier' eligibility requirement, while potentially permissible for a below-threshold national tender post-Brexit, is unduly restrictive and limits competition.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds
•Restrictive 'UK supplier' eligibility requirement
Clarity40/100
The tender lacks critical clarity regarding the scope of supply and the expected quality/specifications of the uniforms and PPE. Technical requirements are extremely vague, providing no specific standards, materials, quantities, or sizing information.
•Extreme vagueness of technical requirements (e.g., 'appropriate uniforms and PPE', 'ensure safety and maintain professional standards')
•Lack of specific standards, materials, quantities, or sizing information
Completeness75/100
The tender is critically incomplete, lacking almost all essential documentation and detailed information required for a fair and competitive bidding process. No tender documents are attached, and crucial details like estimated value and evaluation criteria are missing.
•No tender documents attached (0 total)
•Missing estimated value
Fairness40/100
The tender raises significant concerns regarding fairness due to the restrictive 'UK supplier' eligibility, the critical lack of transparency, and highly subjective requirements. This environment could lead to arbitrary evaluation and potentially favor specific bidders with prior knowledge or existing relationships.
•Restrictive 'UK supplier' eligibility limits competition
•Lack of detailed specifications and evaluation criteria creates subjectivity
Practicality40/100
The tender, in its current form, is impractical for both bidders to respond to effectively and for the contracting authority to conduct a robust, objective, and defensible evaluation. Bidders cannot prepare meaningful proposals without essential information.
•Bidders cannot practically prepare a meaningful bid without specifications, quantities, or evaluation criteria
•Authority cannot objectively evaluate bids without clear criteria and specifications
Data Consistency100/100
Within the very limited information provided, there are no explicit inconsistencies. However, the severe lack of data makes it impossible to assess consistency comprehensively.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not incorporate any sustainability or social responsibility considerations, which is a missed opportunity for modern public procurement practices.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria