Legal Compliance100/100
The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds and an open procedure, indicating an intent for legal compliance. However, the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and, crucially, the absence of evaluation criteria in the provided summary are significant omissions that could impact transparency and fairness, which are core principles of public procurement.
•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria, which is fundamental for an open procedure.
Clarity40/100
The description of the service's aims, objectives, and the process for accessing full documentation is clear. However, the eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are presented at a high level, lacking the specific detail necessary for bidders to formulate precise and fully compliant proposals.
•High-level and unspecific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Completeness83/100
The provided information is explicitly incomplete, serving as a summary rather than the full tender documentation. Key elements such as detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific eligibility criteria, comprehensive technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are stated to be in external documents, which are not provided for analysis.
•Critical absence of the full procurement documentation.
•Missing detailed technical specifications and performance indicators.
Fairness60/100
Without the full procurement documentation, particularly the evaluation criteria, it is impossible to fully assess the fairness of the tender process. The high-level requirements, while not explicitly tailored, could lead to subjective interpretation during evaluation if not supported by clear, objective criteria.
•Inability to assess fairness due to missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality40/100
The service description is practical and addresses a clear need. The instructions for accessing the full documents via the Atamis portal are practical. However, the lack of detailed requirements in the summary could make it impractical for bidders to initiate bid preparation without first obtaining and thoroughly reviewing the complete documentation.
Data Consistency100/100
The financial figures (estimated total value in EUR and annual value in GBP) appear consistent when considering the maximum contract duration and typical exchange rates. The tender explicitly states to submit bids via the Atamis portal, which contradicts the automated check result indicating 'No e-submission'.
•Automated check result 'No e-submission' contradicts the tender's clear instruction to use the Atamis portal for bid submission.
Sustainability25/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator of considering social sustainability aspects. However, there is no mention of environmental or green procurement criteria in the provided summary.
•No explicit mention of environmental or green procurement criteria.