Capital Investment Research

This tender provides clear basic information and practical submission details, but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and significant data inconsistency in the estimated value, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the provided content refers to external documents for full details on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements, which slightly reduces its self-contained legal compliance.

While the project description is clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency. Requirements are high-level and frequently refer to external documents for specifics, diminishing overall clarity within the provided information.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and the need to consult external links for comprehensive legal and financial requirements. One document also failed to download.

The tender utilizes e-procurement and requirements appear generic, but the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency. Bidders cannot adequately prepare or understand the basis of assessment, creating an uneven playing field.

This tender excels in practicality, supporting electronic submission via a dedicated portal with clear URLs. The contract start date, duration, and estimated value are all explicitly provided, facilitating bidder planning.

A significant inconsistency exists between the estimated value stated in EUR (60,000.00) and GBP (£50,000) in the PDF summary. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.