Key Holding, Property Inspections and First Responder Services

This tender provides a clear description of required security services and specifies key eligibility and technical requirements. However, it suffers from significant omissions regarding legal compliance, clarity, and fairness due to the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission.

The tender lacks a clear reveal date and, based on the provided information, does not explicitly state mandatory exclusion grounds or evaluation criteria, which are critical for legal compliance and transparency. The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and there are no disputes.

The description of services and basic requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most essential information, such as title, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are listed as available. Nevertheless, the lack of defined evaluation criteria represents a significant gap in the tender's completeness.

The absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission support are major concerns for fairness, as they hinder transparency and equal access for all bidders. Requirements appear generic and the value is disclosed.

The tender's practicality is hampered by the absence of e-submission, which is a significant operational drawback. Other practical elements like contract start date and duration are clearly specified.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. However, minor fields such as 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are unpopulated, indicating slight incompleteness.

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability principles.