Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System under the Light Touch Regime is a legally compliant procurement approach for these services. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in this notice means bidders cannot fully assess compliance without the full application documents.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in the notice.
•Financial requirements not detailed in the notice.
Clarity40/100
The overall purpose and mechanism of the DPS are clearly described. However, the specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are vague, directing bidders to non-existent (in this notice) full application documents, which significantly reduces clarity for initial assessment.
•Vague eligibility requirements ('Be capable of meeting the criteria for accreditation').
•Vague technical capability requirements ('Possess the capability to provide residential and nursing care services').
Completeness83/100
This tender notice is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of attached tender documents. Key information such as detailed exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive application.
•No tender documents attached or available.
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure inherently promotes fairness by allowing continuous application. However, the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria in this notice could lead to perceived unfairness if the full documents, when released, contain overly restrictive or unclear conditions, or if the assessment process is not transparent.
•Lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria could hinder fair competition if not clearly defined in full documents.
Practicality40/100
The DPS model is practical for ongoing service needs. However, the current notice is impractical for bidders as they cannot assess their suitability or prepare an application without access to the full tender documents and detailed requirements.
•Bidders cannot practically assess suitability or prepare applications without full documentation.
•No e-submission specified, which could impact efficiency.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the notice is consistent. The primary issue is the absence of crucial data rather than inconsistencies in what is presented.
Sustainability0/100
There is no mention of environmental, social, or innovation criteria within the provided tender information, representing a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability objectives.
•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.