Retrofit Consultancy & Principal Designer services

This tender clearly outlines a two-stage procurement process but suffers from critical missing evaluation criteria and a lack of e-submission, impacting transparency and practicality. It also misses opportunities for sustainability integration.

The procedure type and CPV code are clear and appropriate, and the PSQ stage deadline is reasonable. However, the explicit flag 'No evaluation criteria specified' and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds or financial requirements in the AI-extracted summary are significant concerns regarding full legal compliance and transparency. A minor detail is the missing procedure code.

The two-stage procurement process and shortlisting mechanism are clearly described. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for the 'scored submissions' is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are well-defined. However, the tender lacks explicit financial requirements, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and, most critically, the full evaluation criteria. The provided documents are administrative, not the comprehensive tender specification.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the PSQ submission deadline is reasonable. Nevertheless, the absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and equal opportunity for bidders. The lack of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier to access.

The contract start date and duration are clearly stated. However, the absence of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. An explicit document URL is also not provided in the summary.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender does not incorporate any explicit green, social, or innovation criteria, nor is it EU-funded, representing a missed opportunity to promote sustainable procurement practices.