Legal Compliance100/100
The tender specifies an 'Open procedure,' which generally promotes competition. However, the provided extract lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and the automated check indicates missing evaluation criteria, both of which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency in public procurement.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided tender description or analysis, requiring bidders to refer to non-existent full documents.
•Missing evaluation criteria, which are crucial for ensuring a legally sound and transparent selection process.
Clarity40/100
The project description clearly articulates the research scope, objectives, and required multi-disciplinary expertise. However, the critical absence of full tender documents means that specific instructions, detailed technical specifications, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms remain entirely unclear to potential bidders.
•Lack of access to full tender documents prevents assessment of clarity regarding submission instructions, detailed technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and contractual terms.
Completeness83/100
While the project's thematic description and required expertise are detailed, the tender is critically incomplete due to the total absence of actual tender documents. This includes essential components such as detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, terms and conditions, and any annexes.
•No tender documents attached or available for review, making a full assessment of completeness impossible.
•Missing evaluation criteria, which are crucial for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged and to prepare a complete submission.
Fairness60/100
The requirement for a consortium suggests an intent to foster broad participation and leverage diverse expertise. However, the highly specialized and extensive list of technical capabilities, combined with the complete lack of evaluation criteria and full documents, raises concerns about potential barriers to entry or perceived tailoring, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection.
•Absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness and objectivity of the selection process.
•The extensive and highly specialized technical requirements, while necessary for the project, could potentially limit competition if not clearly defined, weighted, and transparently evaluated within comprehensive tender documents.
Practicality40/100
The project scope is ambitious and complex, appropriately requiring a multi-disciplinary consortium. However, the complete lack of full tender documents presents significant practical challenges for bidders, making it nearly impossible to prepare a comprehensive, compliant, and competitive submission.
•Bidders face severe practical challenges in preparing a comprehensive proposal without access to full tender documents, including detailed specifications, submission guidelines, and evaluation criteria.
•The absence of an e-submission platform (as flagged by automated checks) adds a layer of practical inconvenience in modern procurement.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information within the description and extracted requirements is internally consistent regarding the project's scope, objectives, and required expertise. No contradictions are apparent within the given text.
Sustainability50/100
The tender's core focus on climate services, net zero, and resilience inherently aligns with environmental sustainability goals. The inclusion of 'Social Criteria' also indicates a broader sustainability perspective. However, the automated check noted 'Not green procurement,' suggesting a potential lack of specific environmental criteria within the procurement process itself, despite the subject matter being highly sustainable.
•Automated check indicates 'Not green procurement,' suggesting a potential absence of specific environmental criteria or clauses within the procurement process, despite the tender's subject matter being directly related to environmental sustainability.