ITT for the Provision of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) and PPM (Planned Preventative Maintenance) Services to York St John University

This tender is well-structured with clear service descriptions and practical submission methods, but it significantly lacks transparency due to missing evaluation criteria and detailed legal disclosures.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date, missing procedure type codes, and, most critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance gaps. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned but not detailed.

The description of the services, duration, and locations is clear. AI-extracted requirements are understandable. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and a lack of detailed performance conditions significantly reduce the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. The major deficiency is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is fundamental for a complete tender.

Full document access and e-procurement via the Delta eSourcing portal promote fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. The 'Value Classified: Yes' while the value is disclosed is a minor inconsistency.

Electronic submission is clearly supported via the Delta eSourcing portal, and direct URLs are provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, making the tender practical for bidders.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field, missing codes for procedure types, and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' statement alongside the disclosed estimated value.

The tender makes no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.