Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines its purpose as a pre-market engagement, not a formal procurement, which aligns with its status. CPV codes are appropriately assigned. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are listed as 'None' in the basic information, which is a formal inconsistency, even if the description clarifies the intent. No disputes or suspensions are noted.
•Formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are empty despite clear description.
Clarity80/100
The description is exceptionally clear, detailing the purpose of the pre-market engagement and the extensive functional requirements for the portfolio management system. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand. The absence of evaluation criteria is appropriate for a market sounding exercise.
Completeness70/100
Most essential information, such as title, organization, reference, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. Requirements are well-defined. The estimated value is classified, which is acceptable for a pre-market engagement. However, the empty 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields in the basic info represent minor gaps in structured data completeness.
•Formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are empty.
•'Liable Person' field is empty.
Fairness85/100
Full document access and electronic submission via Delta eSourcing are supported, promoting equal access. The requirements, while detailed, appear to be functional specifications for a complex system rather than tailored to a specific company. The classified value is understandable for a pre-market stage.
Practicality75/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported, and direct URLs for the questionnaire and portal are provided. The contract start date and duration are specified. While the estimated value is classified, the overall practical aspects for suppliers to engage are good.
•Estimated value is classified, limiting supplier insight into potential contract scale.
Data Consistency80/100
Dates are logical and consistent. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked 'None' despite the clear textual description of a pre-market engagement, indicating minor inconsistencies in structured data.
•'Liable Person' field is empty.
•'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked 'None' despite textual clarity.
Sustainability50/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender documentation. This is common for IT system procurements and pre-market engagements, but it represents an area for potential future enhancement.
•No explicit sustainability criteria.
•No explicit social aspects.