Legal Compliance100/100
The tender correctly identifies mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a standard legal requirement. However, without access to the full tender documentation, it is impossible to verify full compliance with all UK public procurement regulations regarding transparency, competition, and detailed process steps.
•Lack of full tender documentation prevents comprehensive legal compliance verification.
Clarity40/100
The general description of the DPS scope, waste streams, and geographical coverage is clear. However, the complete absence of any attached documents means that specific requirements, lot structures, technical specifications, and operational details are entirely undefined, leading to extreme lack of clarity for potential bidders.
•Complete absence of specific requirements and technical specifications due to missing documents.
•Lack of detailed lot structure information.
Completeness83/100
The tender information provided is severely incomplete. While basic administrative details are present, the critical absence of any tender documents (0 total) means that essential information such as detailed scope, terms and conditions, evaluation criteria, submission instructions, and contract particulars are entirely missing.
•No tender documents attached.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure itself is designed to promote fairness by allowing new entrants throughout its lifetime. However, the complete lack of detailed requirements, specifications, and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess if the tender is genuinely fair and non-discriminatory in practice. Without these details, there's a risk of subjective assessment or tailoring during subsequent mini-competitions.
•Inability to assess fairness due to missing detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
•Potential for subjective assessment in subsequent mini-competitions without clear upfront criteria.
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, it is currently impractical to prepare a meaningful submission as there are no documents outlining what is required. The tender, in its current state, serves only as an announcement without actionable content for participation.
•Impossible for bidders to prepare a submission without any tender documents.
•Lack of e-submission details (as flagged by automated check).
Data Consistency100/100
Given the extremely limited data provided, there are no apparent inconsistencies. However, the lack of detailed documentation means there is insufficient information to perform a thorough consistency check.
Sustainability25/100
The tender mentions 'Innovation Focus,' which can contribute to sustainability. However, the automated check explicitly flags 'Not green procurement' and 'No social criteria.' Without specific requirements in the missing documents, there's no evidence of concrete sustainability or social value considerations being integrated into the procurement.
•Lack of explicit green procurement requirements.
•Absence of social criteria.