Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears to follow a standard restricted procedure for a DPS. However, the absence of full tender documentation, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements in the provided extract makes a comprehensive legal compliance assessment impossible.
•Absence of full tender documentation
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity40/100
The description of the services, the purpose of the DPS, and the lot structure is clear and well-defined. The eligibility and technical capability requirements, as far as they go, are also clear.
Completeness75/100
The provided information is highly incomplete, explicitly stating that bidders must refer to 'full tender documentation' for mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and further submission details. Crucially, no documents are attached, rendering the current listing an announcement rather than an actionable tender.
•No full tender documentation provided
•Missing detailed financial requirements
Fairness40/100
The requirement for current DPS suppliers to re-tender is standard for a replacement DPS and ensures fair competition. However, the lack of full documentation, especially evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, creates a significant barrier to fair and equal participation for all potential bidders.
•Lack of full tender documentation hinders fair competition
•Absence of evaluation criteria prevents transparent assessment
Practicality40/100
It is impractical for potential suppliers to prepare a comprehensive and compliant tender submission based solely on the limited information provided. The repeated instruction to refer to 'full tender documentation' without providing it makes the current listing unactionable.
•Inability to prepare a tender without full documentation
•Missing detailed submission requirements
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the extract is consistent. However, the lack of full documentation means there is insufficient data to assess overall consistency across all tender materials.
Sustainability25/100
The tender mentions 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator for social sustainability. However, no specific details are provided on how these criteria will be assessed or what they entail, and environmental sustainability aspects are not mentioned.
•Lack of specific details on 'Social Criteria'
•Absence of environmental sustainability considerations