Legal Compliance100/100
The tender is an Open procedure, which generally promotes competition. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements in the provided text is a notable omission that could lead to legal ambiguities if not fully addressed in the complete tender documents.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
•No explicit financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.
Clarity40/100
The description of the service, contract lots, and duration is clear and well-defined. However, the overall clarity for potential bidders is severely hampered by the absence of full tender documents, detailed specifications, and evaluation criteria.
•Lack of full tender documents and detailed specifications.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Completeness83/100
This tender is highly incomplete based on the provided information. Crucial elements such as full tender documents, detailed technical specifications beyond weight classes, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and especially evaluation criteria are missing, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid.
•No documents attached or content available.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The lot structure, allowing bids on combinations, promotes broader participation. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and full tender documents creates a significant fairness issue, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged, leading to potential arbitrary decisions and a lack of transparency.
•Missing evaluation criteria, leading to a lack of transparency and potential for arbitrary evaluation.
•Lack of full tender documents, creating an uneven playing field for bidders.
Practicality40/100
The concept of procuring owner-operated vacuum excavators across distinct weight classes with qualified operators for county-wide coverage is practical for the Council's operational needs. However, the lack of detailed information makes it impractical for bidders to accurately cost and plan their bids.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare accurate and competitive bids due to missing detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
Data Consistency100/100
Within the provided text, the information is consistent. The title, reference, description, and lot structure align logically.
Sustainability0/100
No information regarding green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus is provided. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria mentioned.