Legal Compliance100/100
The tender uses an open procedure, which is generally compliant. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the complete lack of tender documents and evaluation criteria, pose significant legal compliance risks and could lead to challenges regarding transparency and equal treatment.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided.
•Missing evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental requirement for a legally sound procurement process.
Clarity40/100
The description of the required service and the various waste delivery options is reasonably clear. However, the overall clarity of the procurement is severely compromised by the complete absence of any detailed tender documents, specifications, or terms and conditions.
•No tender documents attached or available, leading to significant ambiguity regarding detailed requirements and terms.
•Missing evaluation criteria, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. Essential components such as full tender documents, detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, and explicit financial requirements are entirely missing. This prevents bidders from preparing comprehensive and compliant proposals.
•No tender documents attached or available, rendering the tender incomplete.
•Missing evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a complete tender.
Fairness60/100
The fairness of this procurement is severely compromised. The absence of evaluation criteria means bidders cannot understand the basis for award, and the lack of any tender documents prevents equal access to comprehensive information. The geographical restriction for direct delivery to a processing plant (within approximately 20-mile radius of M5/M4 junction) could be seen as potentially tailoring requirements to a limited number of suppliers, thereby restricting competition.
•Missing evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental requirement for fair competition.
•No tender documents attached or available, hindering equal access to information for all potential bidders.
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, this tender is highly impractical. Without any tender documents, detailed requirements, or evaluation criteria, it is impossible to formulate a meaningful, compliant, and competitive bid. This also raises concerns about the practicality of the Council's ability to manage the evaluation process effectively.
•No tender documents attached or available, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a proper submission.
•Missing evaluation criteria, preventing bidders from understanding how to optimize their offer.
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the limited information provided in the extract, the data appears consistent. However, the complete absence of full tender documents makes it impossible to conduct a thorough check for consistency across all potential tender components.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria. For a waste treatment contract, this represents a missed opportunity to encourage environmentally friendly practices, social value, or innovative treatment solutions.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.