Legal Compliance100/100
The tender outlines standard eligibility and technical requirements pertinent to radioactive waste transport, which align with regulatory expectations. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract is a notable omission, though these are typically standard in public procurement and might be detailed in full documents.
Clarity40/100
The description of services and the high-level eligibility and technical requirements are clear and directly relevant to the specialized nature of radioactive waste transport. However, the overall clarity for applicants is hampered by the stated absence of full tender documents and detailed submission instructions.
Completeness83/100
This is a significant weakness. The tender explicitly states 'No documents attached,' 'No document content available,' 'Missing evaluation criteria,' and 'No specific financial requirements.' While it's a DPS, applicants typically need more comprehensive information upfront to assess their suitability and prepare a robust application.
Fairness80/100
The lack of specific financial requirements and, crucially, missing evaluation criteria could lead to a less transparent and potentially unfair assessment process. Without clear evaluation criteria, applicants cannot fully understand how their submissions will be judged, which can disadvantage smaller or less experienced bidders. The highly specialized nature of the service inherently limits competition, but the DPS structure aims to keep it open.
Practicality40/100
The specified technical capabilities (specialized vehicles, trained personnel, compliance with regulations like ADR/IAEA) are highly practical and essential for the safe and secure transport of radioactive waste. The DPS mechanism is a practical approach for a long-term, recurring need for specialized services.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent. The estimated value and contract duration are appropriate for a long-term, specialized DPS.
Sustainability0/100
The automated check flags 'Not green procurement,' 'No social criteria,' and 'No innovation focus.' Given the long contract duration and the nature of public procurement, the absence of these considerations is a missed opportunity for the contracting authority to promote broader public policy objectives.