CCTV Installation Project

This is a well-structured market engagement notice, clearly communicating its purpose for an upcoming CCTV installation project. However, it lacks specific details for the actual tender, which are deferred to a later stage, and shows no integration of sustainability criteria.

The notice clearly defines itself as a market engagement exercise, not a formal tender, which explains the 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None'. The submission deadline provides 14 days from today's date, which is reasonable for a market engagement. However, the actual reveal date is not provided, making it impossible to confirm the full duration between reveal and submission. CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes.

The document is very clear about its purpose as a market engagement for an upcoming procurement. It explicitly states that detailed requirements (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, evaluation criteria) are 'not yet provided' and will be detailed in the full tender documentation. This clarity about what is missing is a strength.

Basic information (title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, location) is provided, and documents are attached. However, critical details for a *full tender*, such as specific eligibility, technical, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria, are explicitly stated as missing. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty. While expected for a market engagement, this significantly impacts completeness if viewed as a 'tender' in its entirety.

Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline for market engagement response is reasonable. The use of an e-sourcing platform promotes equal access. Since specific requirements are not yet defined, there's no indication of tailoring.

Electronic submission is supported via a provided link. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information (estimated value) is available.

Dates are logical and consistent. No disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are explicitly 'None', which, while accurate for a market engagement, indicates missing formal classification data for the *future tender*.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. The project is not EU funded. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability considerations at this preliminary stage.