Repeated procurement - Activities for preschool and school-aged children to promote physical activity

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to undisclosed value, missing evaluation criteria, and reported restricted document access and lack of e-submission, despite having detailed technical requirements.

While deadlines are reasonable, the procedure type and CPV codes are defined, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, reported restricted document access, and lack of e-submission raise significant concerns regarding compliance with EU/national procurement regulations and mandatory disclosure requirements.

The description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and detailed for each part. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria severely impacts the overall clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, and location details are well-provided, and documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing contract duration, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria.

This category presents major concerns. The reported restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, complete absence of evaluation criteria, and lack of e-submission fundamentally undermine transparency, equal access, and objective competition, making the tender highly unfair.

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical barrier for bidders. Additionally, the missing contract start date and duration, along with potential issues in document accessibility, reduce the practicality of preparing a comprehensive and timely bid.

Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes. However, the data suffers from inconsistencies, notably the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged as an issue, as well as missing key fields like estimated value and contract duration.

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks any specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability goals.