Bikeability Training

This tender is critically deficient due to an unrealistic estimated value, complete absence of tender documents, and missing fundamental legal and procedural requirements, making it practically impossible for legitimate bidders to respond.

Legal compliance is severely lacking. The absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and clear, objective evaluation criteria contravenes basic public procurement principles and regulations.

Clarity is extremely poor. The complete lack of any tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, or financial requirements renders the tender highly ambiguous and uninterpretable for potential bidders.

The tender is grossly incomplete. Essential components such as full tender documents, mandatory exclusion/eligibility criteria, and financial requirements are entirely absent, hindering fair competition.

Fairness is highly questionable. The absence of essential information, particularly tender documents and clear evaluation criteria, creates an uneven playing field. The extremely low estimated value further exacerbates concerns about fair competition.

The tender is impractical. The estimated value of 80 EUR for a 12-month training program is unrealistic, and the complete lack of documentation makes it impossible for any serious bidder to formulate a compliant and competitive proposal.

Data consistency is poor. The estimated value of 80 EUR for a 12-month training program is fundamentally inconsistent with the described scope of work, suggesting a potential error or misrepresentation.

No specific sustainability, social, or innovation criteria are included, representing a missed opportunity for broader public value in the procurement process.