Transport services for art objects of the exhibition "From Art Deco to Modern Times. Design and Craftsmanship in France"

This tender for art object transport services provides basic information and detailed technical requirements but is significantly hampered by critical issues such as restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, severely impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure and type clearly, and the deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' flags are significant legal compliance concerns. The AI summary also notes no explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, which are typically standard.

The tender description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and detailed, outlining the scope of services well. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, value, duration, and location are provided. Technical requirements are detailed. However, the tender is incomplete due to 'Missing evaluation criteria' and 'Restricted document access'. Furthermore, a document containing 'selection criteria' and 'submission instructions' is marked as 'Required: No', which is a significant oversight.

Fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria', which prevent equal access to information and transparent assessment. While the value is disclosed and the deadline is reasonable, these fundamental flaws create an uneven playing field.

The tender states 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive for practicality. The duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of an explicit document URL, an unknown contract start date, and the 'No e-submission' flag from automated checks (despite the characteristic) indicate potential practical hurdles.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes. However, the inconsistency of a critical document ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija') being marked as 'Required: No' despite containing essential information, and the conflict between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag, reduce the consistency score.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.