United Kingdom4 days leftOpen

PROC-5442 Abandoned Vehicle Recovery and Destruction of Vehicles.

Tender Overview

LOCATION

East Midlands, United Kingdom

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 06, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

50118000

REFERENCE

002000-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

High Peak Borough Council wish to appoint a suitably experienced and competent contractor through a competitive tender exercise to complete Abandoned Vehicle Recovery and Destruction of Vehicles.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a suitably experienced contractor.
  • Be a competent contractor.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Possess the capability to perform abandoned vehicle recovery.
  • Possess the capability to perform vehicle destruction.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit an offer that demonstrates the best commercial value.
  • Propose pricing for the services, as no estimated contract value is provided.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the tender by the deadline of 2026-02-06 12:00:00.
  • Participate in an open competitive tender exercise.
  • Ensure submissions meet essential requirements for evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002000-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
High Peak Borough Council is seeking an experienced contractor for abandoned vehicle recovery and destruction through an open competitive tender, with submissions due by February 6, 2026, and evaluation based on best commercial value and essential requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender suffers from severe incompleteness, lacking fundamental documentation and detailed requirements, which significantly hinders fair competition and objective evaluation. The absence of actual tender documents is the primary concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

While the tender specifies an 'open competition' procedure, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed requirements in the provided summary makes a comprehensive assessment of legal compliance challenging. The lack of actual tender documents prevents a full legal review.

No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are stated, which should typically be detailed in tender documents.
Absence of actual tender documents makes it impossible to fully assess compliance with procurement regulations.
Clarity40/100

The tender's description is clear, but the 'extracted requirements' are extremely vague and subjective (e.g., 'suitably experienced,' 'competent,' 'possess the capability'). This lack of specificity creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders regarding expectations and how their qualifications will be assessed.

Vague eligibility and technical capability requirements ('suitably experienced', 'competent', 'possess the capability').
Absence of detailed scope of work, service level agreements, or performance indicators.
Completeness75/100

The tender information is critically incomplete. Key elements such as actual tender documents, detailed specifications, comprehensive evaluation criteria, and an estimated contract value are entirely missing. This severely limits a bidder's ability to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.

No tender documents are attached or available for review.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for all aspects of the tender.
Fairness40/100

The 'open competition' procedure aims for fairness. However, the extreme lack of detail in requirements and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could lead to a subjective and opaque evaluation process. This creates a risk of unfair treatment, potentially favoring bidders with prior knowledge or those who can make assumptions about the council's unstated preferences.

Vague eligibility and technical requirements could lead to subjective interpretation and assessment, potentially disadvantaging new market entrants.
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it impossible to ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process.
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, preparing a competitive and compliant offer is highly impractical without detailed specifications, a clear scope of work, and explicit evaluation criteria. The undisclosed estimated value further complicates accurate pricing. For the procuring authority, evaluating offers based on such vague requirements will be challenging and prone to disputes.

Bidders cannot accurately price services without an estimated contract value or detailed scope of work.
Difficult for bidders to demonstrate 'suitably experienced' or 'competent' without clear, objective metrics.
Data Consistency100/100

The limited data provided is internally consistent. However, the overall sparseness of information prevents a comprehensive assessment of data consistency across a full set of tender documents.

Sustainability0/100

There is no information provided regarding environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria within the tender. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.

Absence of any green procurement criteria.
Absence of any social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title, reference number, and organization are specified.
A general description of the required service is provided.
The procurement type is specified as 'Open' competition.
Contract duration is clearly stated as 24 months.
CPV code is provided for service classification.

Concerns

Absence of actual tender documents and detailed specifications.
Missing explicit and objective evaluation criteria.
Vague and subjective eligibility and technical capability requirements.
Estimated contract value is not disclosed, hindering accurate pricing.
Potential for subjective evaluation due to lack of objective criteria, raising fairness concerns and potential for perceived tailoring.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, scope of work, and service level agreements.
2. Clearly define and publish objective and measurable evaluation criteria for all aspects (experience, competence, technical capability, commercial value).
3. Provide an estimated contract value or a clear methodology for pricing to enable accurate and comparable bid submissions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
63/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes