2025 - 1074 - Independent Disrepair Surveying Services

This tender presents significant contradictions regarding its procedure type, being labeled 'Open competition' while simultaneously stating it is a 'closed, invite only process.' This, coupled with the absence of evaluation criteria, severely undermines fairness, clarity, and legal compliance.

The tender fundamentally contradicts itself by being classified as an 'Open competition' while explicitly stating it is a 'closed, invite only process.' This is a severe breach of procurement principles, as an open procedure must be accessible to all interested parties. The missing tender reveal date also hinders a full assessment of initial compliance. The inconsistent value classification (disclosed yet marked 'Yes') adds to the concern.

While the description of services and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear, the core ambiguity lies in the contradictory procedure type ('Open' vs. 'invite only'), which creates confusion about eligibility and participation. Critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, severely impacting clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete for a transparent and fair procurement process. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The declaration of an 'Open competition' as a 'closed, invite only process' is a severe fairness issue, as it directly undermines equal access and transparency, suggesting a pre-selection or tailored process. The complete absence of evaluation criteria further compromises objectivity and transparency, making it impossible for bidders to understand the basis of selection.

Electronic submission is supported, and key contract details like start date and duration are clearly specified. The estimated value is provided, along with the important caveat of no guaranteed orders or minimum quantity, which is practical information for bidders to assess risk. A direct document URL is not provided in the snippet, but access via the portal is implied.

The most significant inconsistency is the fundamental contradiction between the stated 'Open competition' procedure and the 'closed, invite only process' note. Further inconsistencies include the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the estimated value being disclosed, and the discrepancy between the EUR and GBP estimated values. Empty codes for procedure type also indicate minor data gaps.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.