Mortuary Facilities and Pathology Services

This tender is well-structured with clear basic information, but its overall quality is significantly hampered by the absence of critical documentation and evaluation criteria.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the missing reveal date are significant legal compliance issues, impacting transparency and due process.

The description of services and division into lots is clear. Nevertheless, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the 'Schedule 5 – Specification' document severely undermine the clarity of the tender requirements.

While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and the essential 'Schedule 5 – Specification' document.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of an electronic submission option significantly compromise the fairness and equal access for potential bidders. The missing 'Schedule 5' also impacts the ability to prepare a fair bid.

The absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. While other practical details like contract start date and duration are provided, this omission creates a significant barrier.

Most key fields are populated and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, the 'Type Code' is missing, and the 'reveal date' is absent, indicating minor data inconsistencies.

The tender shows no explicit integration of green procurement, social aspects (beyond standard TUPE compliance), or innovation focus, resulting in a very low sustainability score.