Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly references compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, including mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental legal requirement. The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally permissible procurement procedure.
Clarity40/100
The description clearly defines the scope of services (external wall review, fire inspections, remedials) and the geographical area. However, the complete absence of detailed tender documents significantly hinders overall clarity regarding specific requirements, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms.
•Lack of detailed tender documents.
•Ambiguity regarding the 'Restricted' type versus the stated objective of establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Completeness75/100
The tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, full evaluation criteria, and instructions for tenderers are missing, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.
•No documents attached.
•Missing detailed specifications for services.
Fairness60/100
The lack of detailed information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and financial requirements, creates an uneven playing field. Without clear and comprehensive documentation, potential bidders cannot fully understand the expectations or how their submissions will be assessed, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less experienced firms.
•Lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
•Absence of specific financial requirements.
Practicality40/100
The tender's current state, with no attached documents, makes it impractical for potential suppliers to respond effectively. The stated contract duration of 1 month for a DPS is highly unusual and impractical for a system designed for long-term, recurring services.
•No documents attached, making it impractical for bidders to prepare a submission.
•Impractical 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System, which is typically established for several years.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Type: Restricted' and the explicit objective of establishing a 'Dynamic Purchasing System'. While a DPS can be established via a restricted procedure, the primary classification should reflect the DPS nature. Furthermore, the 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a DPS is inconsistent with the typical long-term nature of such systems.
•Inconsistency between 'Type: Restricted' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' as the procurement procedure.
•Inconsistent 'Contract Duration' of 1 month for a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Sustainability0/100
The provided information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria.
•No green procurement criteria specified.
•No social criteria specified.