United Kingdom84 days leftOpen

Industry Econometrics Model

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Rail Delivery Group

LOCATION

Inner London - West, United Kingdom

VALUE

£9,600,000

DEADLINE

April 27, 2026 at 00:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

63711000

REFERENCE

006204-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) are looking to appoint a partner to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model to evaluate, optimise and understand the impact of revenue generating marketing investment across 14 TOCs including both DFTO and non-DFTO operators, and national activity delivered by RDG.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were identified in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific eligibility requirements were identified in the provided information.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Ability to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model.
  • Capability to evaluate, optimise, and understand the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment.
  • Expertise to apply the econometric model across 14 Train Operating Companies (including both DFTO and non-DFTO operators).
  • Expertise to apply the econometric model to national marketing activity delivered by RDG.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements were identified in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-27T00:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

HTM
Planning Notice
General Information006204-2026.html
Summary:
The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) has published a planning notice for an upcoming tender seeking a partner to develop an independent, industry-wide econometric model to evaluate and optimize revenue-generating marketing investment across 14 Train Operating Companies.
DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data006204-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
The Rail Delivery Group seeks a partner to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model for evaluating, optimizing, and understanding the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment across 14 Train Operating Companies and national activities.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006204-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Rail Delivery Group's tender for an econometric model to evaluate and optimize marketing investment across 14 TOCs.
PDF
Official PDF Version
General Information006204-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The Rail Delivery Group is seeking a partner to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model to evaluate, optimise, and understand the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment across 14 train operating companies, with an estimated value of £8 million.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

59
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a clear project description and essential basic information, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to the absence of critical requirements and evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements is a significant concern for legal compliance, despite the 'planning' status.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity60/100

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and other crucial requirement types (exclusion, eligibility, financial) severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Absence of other key requirement types (eligibility, financial)
Completeness55/100

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and documents are provided, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness50/100

The disclosed value and reasonable submission timeframe contribute positively to fairness. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission capabilities significantly undermine the transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Practicality60/100

The lack of electronic submission is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the absence of e-submission reduces the overall practicality and ease of participation.

No electronic submission (e-submission)
Data Consistency85/100

The populated key fields are largely consistent, with logical dates for submission and contract duration. A minor discrepancy exists between the estimated value in EUR and the £8 million mentioned in one document, but this is not a major inconsistency.

Minor discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP in document)
Sustainability25/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a low commitment to sustainability principles within the procurement process.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description
Estimated value disclosed
Appropriate CPV code provided
Reasonable submission timeframe for preparation
Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, duration, start date) is present

Concerns

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Overall incompleteness of critical tender documentation

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
2. Clearly define and publish objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement electronic submission for improved accessibility and efficiency in the bidding process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
59/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes