Legal Compliance100/100
The provided tender notice lacks explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a fundamental requirement in public procurement. The absence of full tender documentation also means the complete legal framework is not immediately accessible.
•Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Full legal terms and conditions are not provided in the initial notice.
Clarity40/100
While the overall objective is clear, many key requirements are vague and subjective (e.g., 'experienced production company,' 'traditional family productions,' 'collaborative skills,' 'unique to our venue'). A significant discrepancy exists between the estimated value in EUR and the fixed annual price in GBP, compounded by an inconsistent contract duration.
•Vague and subjective technical capability requirements lacking objective definitions.
•Significant inconsistency between estimated value (EUR), fixed annual price (GBP), and contract duration (34 months vs. 'three years').
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant weakness. The tender explicitly states that the 'full specification and RFQ documentation and requirements' are available only after registration on an external portal. This means the provided content is an incomplete tender notice, lacking essential details such as full terms and conditions, detailed technical specifications, and crucially, the evaluation criteria.
•Full specification and RFQ documentation are not provided for direct analysis.
•Absence of detailed evaluation criteria, which is critical for a fixed-price contract.
Fairness60/100
The absence of clear, objective eligibility and technical criteria, coupled with the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, makes it challenging to ensure a fair and transparent assessment of bids. The fixed price removes price as a differentiator, placing all emphasis on qualitative aspects which are currently ill-defined. The mention of the theatre's 21-year history of 'traditional family productions' could implicitly favor companies with a similar long-standing track record, potentially limiting competition.
•Absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria.
•Vague technical requirements could lead to subjective assessment.
Practicality40/100
The requirement to register on an e-tendering portal is standard. However, the potentially short timeframe for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals once full documentation is accessed, especially given the initial lack of detail and complexity of the service, could be challenging. The fixed price simplifies financial evaluation but necessitates precise definition of quality and value for money by the procuring authority.
•Potentially short timeframe for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals once full documentation is accessed, given the complexity of the service and initial lack of detail.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a major inconsistency between the 'Estimated Value' (468,000.00 EUR) and the 'fixed price of this provision to £65,000 per annum' for a '34 months' contract duration. The calculated value based on the fixed price is significantly lower than the estimated value. Additionally, the contract duration is stated as '34 months' but also 'over the next three years 2026-2029' (which is 36 months).
•Major discrepancy between estimated value (EUR) and fixed annual price (GBP) over the contract duration.
•Inconsistency in contract duration (34 months vs. 'three years 2026-2029').
Sustainability0/100
The tender notice does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or economic sustainability. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader public value.
•Absence of green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social criteria.