Execution of construction, reconstruction, renovation, and continuous surface renewal works for forest roads in 2026-2028, by concluding a framework agreement

This tender is severely lacking in essential documentation and detailed requirements, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant offer and raising significant concerns about transparency and fairness.

While the procedure type (open) is generally compliant, the complete absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, as well as evaluation criteria, represents a critical failure in adhering to public procurement principles of transparency and equal treatment.

The basic description of the works is clear, but the complete absence of detailed tender documents and specific requirements renders the overall tender highly unclear for potential bidders regarding what is expected for submission and evaluation.

The tender is critically incomplete, with no attached documents and a complete lack of specific requirements across all key categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial). This makes it impossible for bidders to understand the full scope and conditions.

The complete absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of unfair competition and unequal treatment. Without clear parameters, the contracting authority could potentially evaluate bids arbitrarily, or the tender might be implicitly tailored for a specific company that already possesses unstated knowledge of the requirements.

It is practically impossible for any potential bidder to prepare a comprehensive, compliant, and competitive bid based solely on the extremely limited information provided. This will likely lead to a low number of quality submissions or submissions that are not comparable.

The limited data provided is internally consistent. However, the critical issue is the *absence* of comprehensive data, not inconsistency within the available fragments.

No information regarding green procurement or social criteria is provided, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability aspects into the procurement process.