Legal Compliance85/100
The notice clearly functions as a preliminary market engagement (PME), which is a legitimate pre-procurement activity. While formal "Type" and "Procedure" codes are missing, the descriptive text clarifies its purpose, aligning with national regulations for market consultation. Deadlines are reasonable for feedback.
•Missing formal procedure type/code
Clarity90/100
The tender is exceptionally clear about its preliminary nature, explicitly stating it's "merely seeking feedback" and "does not have firm plans to implement it or enter into any contracts." Requirements for submitting feedback are well-defined, and the absence of formal tender requirements (e.g., evaluation criteria) is appropriately explained.
Completeness85/100
All essential basic information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, duration, CPV, NUTS) is provided. The nominal nature of contract dates is clearly communicated, and documents are available. For a PME, the level of detail is appropriate.
•Estimated value not disclosed (though acceptable for PME)
Fairness80/100
The notice promotes fairness by inviting feedback from both existing DPS operators and "any other organisation who may be interested," ensuring broad participation. Document access is provided, and requirements are generic for feedback.
•Estimated value not disclosed (minor for PME)
Practicality60/100
Practicality is moderate due to the preliminary nature. While feedback is requested via a questionnaire, a specific e-submission platform or URL is not explicitly provided. The contract dates and value are nominal or undisclosed, limiting their practical use for future planning by interested parties.
•No explicit e-submission platform/URL
•Contract dates are nominal
Data Consistency90/100
The data is highly consistent. Key fields are populated, and the explicit statement that contract dates are "nominal" effectively resolves any potential inconsistencies, ensuring clarity regarding the non-committal nature of the notice. No disputes or suspensions are reported.
Sustainability40/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or a direct focus on innovative solutions from suppliers. While the council's "new approach" is innovative internally, it's not a call for sustainable or innovative proposals from respondents.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria